Free sex now without charge

posted by | Leave a comment

The statutes that the new laws revise date back to the late 1980s, when AIDS had emerged as a public health crisis in cities such as San Francisco, Los Angeles and New York.Fear and misinformation about the disease’s potential to spread ran high as the authorities struggled to get a handle on the new epidemic and a spate of legislation about HIV exposure cropped up across the country.“Good grief,” wrote the National Review’s Wesley J. “Leave it to California to make a declining and decadent culture even more declining and decadent.” Breitbart’s story about the bill, which drew more than 4,500 comments, focused on three cases, in Michigan, California and Scotland, where in each case a man had allegedly attempted to intentionally infect others. Of the 379 HIV-related convictions in California between 19, only seven — less than 2 percent — included the intent to transmit HIV, according to a recent series of studies from the UCLA School of Law’s Williams Institute.Instead, the law mostly affected sex workers or those suspected of sex work.Joel Anderson (R-Calif.) during debate over the bill, according to the Los Angeles Times.“It’s absolutely crazy to me that we should go light on this.” The bill has since drawn wide media attention, including particularly critical coverage from conservative media sites.

Letting him get away so easily "says to victims that this really isn't that important, because otherwise we'd try to do something about it."But even in those cases, suspects have had no trouble getting away.That requirement that sex workers get HIV tested after convictions will be abolished when the provisions in the bill take effect.“At the very beginning, people expected to see most of the weight playing out in those intentional exposure laws,” said Amira Hasenbush, a fellow at the Williams Institute and the co-author of the reports.Advocates for crime victims say the decision to let fugitives escape is particularly troubling when they are fleeing charges of violent crime or sexual assault."It's just wrong.It's a mockery of the justice process," said Will Marling, the executive director of the National Organization for Victim Assistance.

Leave a Reply

dating for people with depression